Within the modern age science guidelines the world. There has been documented evidences of scientists regularly dismissing incidences of same-sex sexual bonding in the wild as “immoral” or “unscientific” or “pervert” or “disgusting”, and either qualifying its reportage with these phrases or in most cases deciding to not report them at all.
The process of peer-evaluate, which otherwise is an important a part of the prescribed scientific methodology, has been a lot abused by the forces of heterosexualisation to thwart genuine researches that seek to expose their lies, that even scientists who’ve a lot of credibility, who need to expose these lies have to avoid the peer-evaluation course of if they need their work to ever reach the public.
If scientists who scrutinize each other’s work are painted as bullies (or worse, sexist bullies), scientific criticism will change into radioactive—no scientist in her proper mind will go anywhere near it. … Read more